﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>C++博客-Coffee in  Code out---编程的一种境界-最新评论</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/CommentsRSS.aspx</link><description /><language>zh-cn</language><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 10:22:20 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 10:22:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>cnblogs</generator><item><title>re: libjpeg在vs2010下编译</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2013/02/08/129763.html#197781</link><dc:creator>kangear</dc:creator><author>kangear</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2013/02/08/129763.html#197781</guid><description><![CDATA[很好，这应该就是所谓的软解码了，先学习学习这个。<img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/aggbug/197781.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/" target="_blank">kangear</a> 2013-02-08 15:52 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2013/02/08/129763.html#197781#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>re: [转]wxWidgets和QT之间的选择</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2012/04/11/130996.html#170936</link><dc:creator>allenchen</dc:creator><author>allenchen</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2012/04/11/130996.html#170936</guid><description><![CDATA[Qt绘图效率要比wxWidgets高，虽然不是Native GUI，但可能在实现方面对图形刷新效率考虑的最为充分。<br>我比较过，绘制625x23639像素的流程图，鼠标滚动时，Qt刷新非常流畅，wxWidgets则顿挫，同时存在线条中断，闪烁现象。<br><img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/aggbug/170936.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/" target="_blank">allenchen</a> 2012-04-11 17:05 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2012/04/11/130996.html#170936#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>re: libjpeg在vs2010下编译</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2012/01/07/129763.html#163799</link><dc:creator>littlewater</dc:creator><author>littlewater</author><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2012/01/07/129763.html#163799</guid><description><![CDATA[感谢，原来里面带了对应的工程文件的……<img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/aggbug/163799.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/" target="_blank">littlewater</a> 2012-01-07 19:52 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2012/01/07/129763.html#163799#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>re: boost::scoped_ptr作为成员变量的使用</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/25/151782.html#151797</link><dc:creator>xinst</dc:creator><author>xinst</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/25/151782.html#151797</guid><description><![CDATA[@megadeath<br>恩，主要原因是声明了private<img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/aggbug/151797.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/" target="_blank">xinst</a> 2011-07-25 16:16 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/25/151782.html#151797#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>re: boost::scoped_ptr作为成员变量的使用</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/25/151782.html#151795</link><dc:creator>megadeath</dc:creator><author>megadeath</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/25/151782.html#151795</guid><description><![CDATA[不光是重载了赋值操作符和拷贝构造函数的原因才不能被赋值的，是这两个函数被声明为private，因此不能（被调用）被赋值。<img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/aggbug/151795.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/" target="_blank">megadeath</a> 2011-07-25 16:10 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/25/151782.html#151795#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>re: [转]wxWidgets和QT之间的选择</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/01/130996.html#149876</link><dc:creator>xinst</dc:creator><author>xinst</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/01/130996.html#149876</guid><description><![CDATA[个人对于wxWidgets和Qt的看法是：<br>1、对于图形化处理Qt占有很大的优势，有很多可以直接拿来用的东西。<br>比如图表系统可以用QtPlot；图元可以直接用QGraphics View Framework，效率比自己来控制每个图元要方便的多，QCad是个不错的例子可以学习。<br>还有很多开源的丰富多彩的控件及效果，都是wxWidgets无法比拟的。<br>在这些方面wxWidgets相对来说有些不足。<br>2、但wxWidgets相对来说比较小巧，效率也很不错，也是标准的c++，也可以通过它来自定义很多有用的控件，还有个wxCode库，里面也有N多有用的东西来参考。<br>3、对于移动设备来说，wxWidgets和Qt之间我还是选择Qt，wxWidgets支持的平台相对来说没有那么全。<br><br><img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/aggbug/149876.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/" target="_blank">xinst</a> 2011-07-01 10:17 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/stonexin/archive/2011/07/01/130996.html#149876#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item></channel></rss>