﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>C++博客-yutou's blog-随笔分类-Water</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/category/6225.html</link><description>请不要做浮躁的人，请热爱C++。</description><language>zh-cn</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:58:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:58:55 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>&lt;沟通使您更有魅力&gt;</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/04/20/47677.html</link><dc:creator>yutou</dc:creator><author>yutou</author><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/04/20/47677.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/comments/47677.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/04/20/47677.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/comments/commentRss/47677.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/services/trackbacks/47677.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[du8.com的书..很不错..但是要VIP,,,又是VIP<br><br><a href="http://pic.du8.com/onlineimg/31/bp/sep/2003/31bp.0001.png">http://pic.du8.com/onlineimg/31/bp/sep/2003/31bp.0001.png</a><br><br>这本书的地址是从这里开始的,,,0002 0003 &#8230;0100&#8230;N
<img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/aggbug/47677.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/" target="_blank">yutou</a> 2008-04-20 17:52 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/04/20/47677.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>项目可行性分析方法 --摘自IBM</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/03/09/44048.html</link><dc:creator>yutou</dc:creator><author>yutou</author><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/03/09/44048.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/comments/44048.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/03/09/44048.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/comments/commentRss/44048.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/services/trackbacks/44048.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[<p align=left><strong><span>用可行性研究论证您的项目</span></strong><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>　</span></p>
<p align=left><span>Scott W. Ambler<br></span><span>总裁，</span><span>Ronin International<br>2000 </span><span>年</span><span>8 </span><span>月</span><span>24 </span><span>日</span><span><br></span><span>本文来自 </span>http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/tw/library/tip-justify/<br><br><br><br></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 在任何项目的开始阶段，项目组都要为项目的总体工作做一些准备工作。在</span><span> Rational Unified Process</span><span>（</span><span>RUP</span><span>）和面向对象的软件过程（</span><span>OOSP</span><span>）中，这个阶段称为启动阶段。本周，我们考虑如何确定一个项目是否值得启动。本文由《</span><span>Process Patterns</span><span>》的第五章改编而来。</span></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 启动项目的一个重要环节就是对项目进行论证；也就是说，确定是否应该立项。遗憾的是，论证经常是完成得最差的一项任务。</span><span>85% </span><span>以上的大型项目以失败告终（请参阅</span><span><a href="http://www.sawin.com.cn/doc/SD/UML/uml-feasibility.htm#resources#resources"><span>参考资源</span></a></span><span>中的《</span><span>Patterns of Software Systems Failure and Success</span><span>》一书），这一事实表明大多数项目在论证阶段就应该中止，而不是在为其作了大量投资（并造成损失）之后。论证阶段的主要目标是，确定项目的最佳实施方案，如果存在这样的方案，还要论证它为什么是最佳的。</span></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 图</span><span>1</span><span>描绘了针对论证阶段的过程模型的解决方案。论证项目时需要完成几项工作，论证项目的主要结果便是可行性研究。为了进行可行性研究，您将重复下列步骤：</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.sawin.com.cn/doc/SD/UML/uml-feasibility.htm#1#1"><span>确定可选的实施方案</span></a> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.sawin.com.cn/doc/SD/UML/uml-feasibility.htm#2#2"><span>评估每项可选方案的经济可行性</span></a> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.sawin.com.cn/doc/SD/UML/uml-feasibility.htm#3#3"><span>评估每项可选方案的技术可行性</span></a> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.sawin.com.cn/doc/SD/UML/uml-feasibility.htm#4#4"><span>评估每项可选方案的运行可行性</span></a> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.sawin.com.cn/doc/SD/UML/uml-feasibility.htm#5#5"><span>选择一项可选方案</span></a> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.sawin.com.cn/doc/SD/UML/uml-feasibility.htm#6#6"><span>确定潜在的风险</span></a> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>　</span></p>
<p align=left><a name=Figure1><strong><span>图</span></strong></a><strong><span> 1. </span></strong><strong><span>论证阶段的过程模型</span></strong></p>
<p align=left><span><br></span><span><img height=155 src="http://www.vchome.net/swengineer/umlrosecmm/pics1/image001.gif" width=580 border=0></span></p>
<p align=left><a name=1><span>　</span></a></p>
<p align=left><span>　</span></p>
<p align=left><strong><span>确定可选的实施方案</span></strong></p>
<p align=left><span><br></span><span>可行性研究的第一阶段是确定项目潜在的可选实施方案。与流行的观点正好相反，实现应用时总有多种选择，包括什么都不做、使用多种技术实现它、购买一种类似的系统或者将开发工作外包。重要的是，为您的项目确定几个可行的可选实施方案，以便您进行评估和比较，从而最终为自己的公司选择最佳的实施方案。</span></p>
<p align=left><a name=2><strong><span>评估经济可行性</span></strong></a><span><br></span><span>在评估一项可选实施方案的经济可行性时，要回答的基本问题是，</span><span>&#8220;</span><span>该应用何时能收回成本？</span><span>&#8221;</span><span>您可以通过进行成本</span><span>/</span><span>收益分析来回答这个问题。顾名思义，成本</span><span>/</span><span>收益分析就是将应用的全部实际成本与其全部实际财务收益相比较。在《</span><span>The Squandered Computer</span><span>》一书中（请参阅</span><span><a href="http://www.sawin.com.cn/doc/SD/UML/uml-feasibility.htm#resources#resources"><span>参考资源</span></a></span><span>），</span><span>Strassmann </span><span>指出，应该根据可选方案对净现金流量</span><span> — </span><span>即收益超过成本的总金额</span><span> — </span><span>的贡献来评价各个方案，因为所有投资的首要目标就是提高公司的整体业绩。</span></p>
<p align=left><a name=3><strong><span>评估技术可行性</span></strong></a><span><br></span><span>除了经济可行性之外，您还必须确定每项可选实施方案的技术可行性。此时需要回答的基本问题是，</span><span>&#8220;</span><span>是否能够创建该应用？</span><span>&#8221;</span><span>首先，您必须调研该项目要使用的各项技术。技术方面的问题在于，每项技术在行销演示中都能完美地完成工作，而一旦将它购买回来，往往又是另一种情况。因此，您应该鉴定每一种可供选择的技术。请注意，为了进行合理的评估，您可能需要实现一个微型项目，并且创建一个概念验证</span><span> (proof-of-concept) </span><span>原型来检验这些技术是否能协同工作。这是</span><span> RUP </span><span>的描述阶段的基本任务，它可能持续几周或者几个月，但是只有在检验出您选择的技术能否协同工作时才会体现出它的价值。</span></p>
<p align=left><a name=4><strong><span>评估运行可行性</span></strong></a><span><br></span><span>一个应用不应该在经济和技术上行得通，它还必须在运行上行得通。此时要回答的问题的，</span><span>&#8220;</span><span>应用一旦成为产品，是否能够对该应用提供维护和支持？</span><span>&#8221;</span><span>创建一个应用与运行一个应用完全是两码事；因此，您必须确定是否能够有效地运行和支持它。</span></p>
<p align=left><a name=5><strong><span>选择一项可选方案</span></strong></a><span><br></span><span>一旦完成对每项可选实施方案的经济、技术和运行可行性评估，就应该从中选择一种实施方案。请记住</span><span> — </span><span>可行性研究的目标是，比较和对比各项可选实施方案，<em>并</em>提出一个最佳的实施方案。执行该项任务的第一步是，排除任何在经济上、技术上或者运行上不可行的方案。这意味着您可能没有剩下任何可选方案。但是什么都不做可能也是不可行的，它意味着您必须从头再来，鉴定更多的可选方案。如果只剩下一个可选方案，则很容易做出决策；如果最后剩下多个可选方案，则必须选择一个最适合您的公司的实施方案。您还可以只确定可行的可选方案，而将决策权留给上级主管部门。</span></p>
<p align=left><a name=6><strong><span>确定潜在的风险</span></strong></a><span><br></span><span>项目论证工作包括定义潜在的风险，特别是那些与项目的技术和运行可行性相关的潜在风险。关键的一点是应该将它们加入您的风险评估文档，以便在项目实施过程中能够妥善处理它们，这也是今后的技巧要讨论的主题。</span></p>
<p align=left><a name=resources><strong><span>参考资源</span></strong></a><span><br></span><span>关于过程模型和</span><span> Rational Unified Process </span><span>的详细信息，请参阅：</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.ambysoft.com/processPatterns.html"><span>《</span>Process Patterns — Building Large-Scale Systems Using Object Technology<span>》</span></a></span><span>，</span><span>Scott W. Ambler </span><span>著。</span><span>Cambridge University </span><span>出版社，纽约，</span><span>1998 </span><span>年。</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.ambysoft.com/moreProcessPatterns.html"><span>《</span>More Process Patterns — Delivering Large-Scale Systems Using Object Technology<span>》</span></a></span><span>，</span><span>Scott W. Ambler </span><span>著。</span><span>Cambridge University </span><span>出版社，纽约，</span><span>1999 </span><span>年。</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.ambysoft.com/theObjectPrimer.html"><span>《</span>The Object Primer 2nd Edition<span>》</span></a></span><span>，</span><span>Scott W. Ambler </span><span>著。</span><span>Cambridge University </span><span>出版社，纽约，</span><span>2000 </span><span>年。</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.ambysoft.com/inceptionPhase.html"><span>《</span>The Unified Process Inception Phase<span>》</span></a></span><span>，</span><span>Scott W. Ambler </span><span>和</span><span> Larry L. Constantine </span><span>著。</span><span>R&amp;D Books</span><span>，</span><span>CA</span><span>，</span><span>Gilroy</span><span>，</span><span>2000 </span><span>年。</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.ambysoft.com/elaborationPhase.html"><span>《</span>The Unified Process Elaboration Phase<span>》</span></a></span><span>，</span><span>Scott W. Ambler </span><span>和</span><span> Larry L. Constantine </span><span>著。</span><span>R&amp;D Books</span><span>，</span><span>CA</span><span>，</span><span>Gilroy</span><span>，</span><span>2000 </span><span>年。</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://search.borders.com/fcgi-bin/db2www/search/search.d2w/Details?&amp;mediaType=Book&amp;prodID=4399707"><span>《</span>Patterns of Software Systems Failure and Success<span>》</span></a></span><span>，</span><span>Capers Jones </span><span>著。</span><span>International Thomson Computer </span><span>出版社，</span><span>MA</span><span>，</span><span>Boston</span><span>，</span><span>1996 </span><span>年。</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://search.borders.com/fcgi-bin/db2www/search/search.d2w/Details?&amp;mediaType=Book&amp;prodID=51704028"><span>《</span>The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction<span>》，第二版，</span></a>Philippe Kruchten </span><span>著。</span><span>Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.</span><span>，</span><span>MA</span><span>，</span><span>Reading</span><span>，</span><span>2000 </span><span>年。</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://search.borders.com/fcgi-bin/db2www/search/search.d2w/Details?&amp;mediaType=Book&amp;prodID=4210170"><span>《</span>The Squandered Computer: Evaluating the Business Alignment of Information Technologies<span>》</span></a></span><span>，</span><span>Paul Strassmann </span><span>著。</span><span>New Canaan</span><span>，</span><span>CT</span><span>：</span><span>Information Economics </span><span>出版社，</span><span>CT</span><span>，</span><span>New Canaan</span><span>，</span><span>1997 </span><span>年。</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.ambysoft.com/processPatternsPage.html"><span>《</span>The Process Patterns Resource Page<span>》</span></a></span><span>，</span><span>Scott Ambler </span><span>著</span><span> </span></p>
<p align=left><span>&#183;<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://www.ambysoft.com/onlineWritings.html">Scott Ambler <span>的在线文章</span></a></span></p>
<p align=left><br>/*&nbsp; &amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&nbsp; */<br><a name=Figure1><strong><span>图</span></strong></a><strong><span> 1. </span></strong><strong><span>论证阶段的过程模型(译)<br><br>方案文档,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;可行性研究,<br>版本,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;评估运行可行性&nbsp;&nbsp; 风险评估&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;建议,<br>方案评估,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =&gt; 论证执行方案 =&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=&gt;&nbsp; 选择一种方案 =&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; 项目资金,<br>进度表,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;评估经济可行性&nbsp;&nbsp; 评估技术可行性&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;确定潜在风险<br>风险估计<br></span></strong></p>
<img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/aggbug/44048.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/" target="_blank">yutou</a> 2008-03-09 23:45 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/03/09/44048.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>windows vista爱你还是恨你</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/03/01/43517.html</link><dc:creator>yutou</dc:creator><author>yutou</author><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/03/01/43517.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/comments/43517.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/03/01/43517.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/comments/commentRss/43517.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/services/trackbacks/43517.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[<p><font size=2>2006年11月,微软举世瞩目的新一代操作系统windows vista,在人们的千呼万唤中终于面世了.<br><br>时隔一年多,vista并没有让人期待的那样迅速普及.而目前的状况是,这个美丽的"贵妇人"让很多人爱恨交加.蔡明说:"为什么呢?"<br><br>最低配置要求<br>安装vista的最低内存需要512M.这意味着,大部分的中国用户计算机内存数仅仅达到安装vista的最低要求.而且据估计,国内还存在着大量内存数在512M以下的用户,在这样的情况下他们就只能望vista兴叹了.仅计算机配置要求这一点,就大大的阻碍了vista的普及.更糟糕的是,即使你拥有1G的内存,vista的运行速度也没有明显比xp快,从而致使他们中的许多人在体验vista后又迅速转回xp阵营.<br><br>硬软件兼容性<br>不可否认,每一款全新的操作系统的推出都会不可避免的遇到这样的问题,即使是现在风靡世界的windows xp.可问题是,vista的兼容性未免有些让人汗颜.根据MS官方公布的兼容性数据,vista能够兼容当今70%的软件.在vista推出之后的时间里,大量的软件开发商都陆续推出了能在vista中运行的版本.他们不得不在很短的时间内发布能够兼容vista的相应版本,这也带来许多问题,比如软件漏洞、稳定性和其他问题.连当时由google推出的谷歌拼音输入法都出现了难得一见的巨大漏洞.更让人难以忍受的是,有时你不得不使用一些其他的非商业软件,但很多时候,它们中的有一些根本无法在vista中正常运行,这对于大多数人来说都是一个致命性的打击.而且有消息称,vista甚至出现了不认自家软件的荒唐.(vista不能与MSN的两款应用软件兼容)<br><br>打击盗版<br>MS对vista的盗版方面的确做得很优秀,还特别针对vista盗版发布了相关补丁.假如你的vista被确认为盗版,这个补丁会做点什么呢?&nbsp;&nbsp; 1、把你的桌面背景换成纯黑色,即使你换回自己喜欢的桌面背景,系统也会在一小时后重新变成纯黑色 2、每隔一段时间便会弹出气泡,提示你购买正版key&nbsp;&nbsp; 3、开机后提示购买正版key&nbsp; 假如你不讨厌纯黑色的背景,并且能忍受时不时弹出的气泡,那就继续使用吧.这个问题引申出来的问题是,用户愿不愿意购买正版的vista.根据现在MS公布的零售价格,即使是价格最低的家庭普通版,也需要2060RMB.现在,请你在5RMB的xp和2060RMB的vista中抉择吧.<br><br>宝刀不老的windows xp<br>windows xp应当说是windows的又一次重要转折.在全世界的所有计算机里,使用windows xp的用户达到了70%.尽管从xp的第一次发布距今已经时隔快6年,但这款漂亮、稳定的系统依然让很多用户对它不离不弃.他们中的许多人都早已经习惯并且依赖上了这位"姑娘".要他们抛弃熟悉的方式、多年的习惯,甚至那个悦耳的开机音乐,vista的确显得有些信心不足.<br><br>当然,vista绝对不是一无是处的.在安全性上,vista对比xp有了很大的提高.还有那绚丽的用户界面等等,都是vista的魅力所在.<br><br>未来的vista会走向何方呢?这恐怕只有用时间来证明.不论如何,我们都会记得有一个叫vista的东西.<br><br>那个谁谁说:"爱还是恨,这是个问题."</font></p>
<img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/aggbug/43517.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/" target="_blank">yutou</a> 2008-03-01 13:57 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/03/01/43517.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>微软公布文件格式和通信协议文档</title><link>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/02/22/43111.html</link><dc:creator>yutou</dc:creator><author>yutou</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/02/22/43111.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/comments/43111.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/02/22/43111.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/comments/commentRss/43111.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/services/trackbacks/43111.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[http://download.microsoft.com/download/a/e/6/ae6e4142-aa58-45c6-8dcf-a657e5900cd3/Windows_Server_Protocols.zip<br><br>http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/5/e/95ef66af-9026-4bb0-a41d-a4f81802d92c/Windows_Communication_Protocols.zip<br><br>背景：<br>1、微软试图收购yahoo!<br><br>动机：<br>1、一统江湖？<br><br>困难：<br>1、反垄断<br>2、自由，这是互联网的代名词<br><br>结果：<br>1、？ 
<img src ="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/aggbug/43111.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/" target="_blank">yutou</a> 2008-02-22 23:08 <a href="http://www.cppblog.com/luyu16404/archive/2008/02/22/43111.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item></channel></rss>